I read an article written by one of my classmates, and I do not agree with the idea of segregating genders. I think that plan would be as ineffective as teaching abstinence as the only option for birth control. Our education system in Texas is failing, and it would be irresponsible to use almost $870,000 on a hypothesis that has no proof of success.We cannot prevent teens from having sexual contact, and since that is done outside of school this idea is redundant.
I think a better plan would be to improve the education and self worth of our youth. Teens with long term goals are less likely to become pregnant at a younger age. Statistics show that the more educated a woman is the less children she has. If a student receives quality public education and better preparation for the future, I think the teen pregnancy rates would decline. Practicing safe sex goes along with being educated, and conservative law makers need to stop being naive about the issue of teen sex. It is impossible to prevent teen relations, but with all around better education the teen pregnancy rates will decrease.
A Texas Transplant Learning What it Means to be a Texan
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Friday, August 10, 2012
Don't Give up on the Future of Texas
The education system in Texas
is in as much of a crisis as the state budget. The state’s priorities are all
mixed up, and mistakes made today will effect generations of Texans. The disconcerting
fact that we ranked second to last for having a population of 25 and older with
a high school diploma should be a huge wake up call for all Texans. It is
imperative that we completely revamp our thought processes on how we operate
the education system in Texas .
Our population is growing steadily, and we have the second youngest population in
the nation to educate.
Education is like building a house and you need to start
with a strong foundation. Parents should take their role as their child’s first
educator seriously, but that is not the case for all. Programs like pre-k are suppose
to pick up that slack, but funding is being slashed. We are forced to hold
ourselves to a higher standard since integrating global markets are forcing the
U.S. to compete
on a global stage. In order to be competitive in this country and the world, we
must support job growth and advances in technology. Texas
leads the nation in low wage jobs, and that is not supporting the advancement
of this state.
A one size fits all solution rarely works for anyone and
especially in education. Higher education isn’t for everyone, but that is not
the only way to earn a family sustainable wage. In the E.U. they integrate vocational
education starting in middle school along with the regular curriculum. This
helps students figure out their interests before they finish high school and
gets them into the work force faster. For students who want to become doctors
or in other high level professions, our education system should offer more specialty
schools to prepare students more thoroughly.
I understand with our tight state budget those ideas I have
listed could only be long term goals. An attainable solution that could
increase our state revenue is to have a more skilled population. In the past
there were apprenticeships and more on the job training opportunities which resulted
in a economic growth. We need to get back to our roots and take care of our
people. Educating our population and providing family sustainable wages reduces
our burden for Health and Human Service costs and increases the revenue for the
state. The building blocks for economic growth and the future of Texas
lies in how we educate the people.
Friday, August 3, 2012
Texas Women's Health Issues Today Effect Tomorrow
Texas Slowly Takes Away Women's Rights
I agree with your stance that Texas is not taking women's health and reproductive rights seriously. In my first post on my blog I talked about how Rick Perry has destroyed the Women's Health Program in Texas. Federal funds cannot legally pay for abortion services, so attacking Planned Parenthood under that pretense is absurd. I do think women should have the choice to make their own decisions about their reproductive health. More importantly preventive measures are essential to avoiding those tragic decisions in the first place. The answer is not to cut spending and accessibility for women's health.
If Texas truly wants to spend less on state funded healthcare, and avoid fighting unconstitutional wars on abortion clinics then they need to stop unplanned births. Clinics such as Planned Parenthood are necessary to keep low income women healthy, and help them plan their families more responsibly. It is irresponsible for policy makers to cut spending for state family planning programs and then force tax payers to fund Medicaid to pregnant women and their offspring when it could have been avoided for a fraction of the price.
Women who postpone having families until later in life are more likely to have a college education, and a good paying career. When they are given those options, they can provide a better future for their families. An African proverb states “Educate a boy, and you educate an individual. Educate a girl, and you educate a community.”
I agree with your stance that Texas is not taking women's health and reproductive rights seriously. In my first post on my blog I talked about how Rick Perry has destroyed the Women's Health Program in Texas. Federal funds cannot legally pay for abortion services, so attacking Planned Parenthood under that pretense is absurd. I do think women should have the choice to make their own decisions about their reproductive health. More importantly preventive measures are essential to avoiding those tragic decisions in the first place. The answer is not to cut spending and accessibility for women's health.
If Texas truly wants to spend less on state funded healthcare, and avoid fighting unconstitutional wars on abortion clinics then they need to stop unplanned births. Clinics such as Planned Parenthood are necessary to keep low income women healthy, and help them plan their families more responsibly. It is irresponsible for policy makers to cut spending for state family planning programs and then force tax payers to fund Medicaid to pregnant women and their offspring when it could have been avoided for a fraction of the price.
Women who postpone having families until later in life are more likely to have a college education, and a good paying career. When they are given those options, they can provide a better future for their families. An African proverb states “Educate a boy, and you educate an individual. Educate a girl, and you educate a community.”
Friday, July 27, 2012
Is Keeping Austin Local Under Siege?
We are blessed to have so many natural resources at our
disposal in Texas . Austin
has a great campaign for its citizen to be conscious about where their
purchases come from. Having a local economy protects us from the waves of
uncertainty from Wall Street. Many people are unaware that our local economy
and resources are under attack by multi-national corporations.
In Austin
alone, local quarries and building supply companies are being bought out by
multi-national corporations such as Old
Castle . Customers who want to live
by the “keep Austin local” meme
give their business to seemingly local companies without realizing the facade
is merely an illusion. When the corporation buys out a local company it is
rarely publicized in the local paper. They do their best to keep everything as
it was by giving employees raises to maintain similar faces and keeping the
company name the same. Natural resources that are used in building materials
such as gypsum, sand, gravel and rock are the backbone to our economy. When a
new building is created there are new jobs added, and more money is flowing
into the local economy. In order to keep the profits in our local and state
economies we must not let our resources be bought out..
What are the implications of these buyouts? When a small
company is bought out by a larger one, the morale of the employees is
diminished. Going from being a valuable asset to a company to just a number is
a tough pill to swallow. Multi-national corporations are not concerned with the
local community where they are gaining profits from. They are more likely to
pay lower wages, and layoff families to increase their bottom line. The only
ones benefiting from this siege are the families who are given a blank check to
sell off their companies that have been fueling Texas
communities for decades. Keeping local companies in the hands of Texans is imperative
to fight back against Wall Street’s attack on the middle class. These companies should not be allowed to hide
behind their local signs, and Austinites deserve to know where their money is
going.
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Are State Tests Eating up Valuable Classroom Time?
On July 15, 2012, the Burnt Orange Report published the article Op-Ed: A sensible Approach to Decrease the Hours Our Public Schools Spend on Testing.
In terms of public education, Texans should be ashamed that we are 43rd in the nation for high school graduates. What are we doing wrong? According to State Representative Scot Hochberg our current system for preparing students to take state standardized tests such as the STARR is creating a crack in the system for low achieving students and they are falling through. His House Bill 233 would allow high achieving students to opt out of the state tests in the fourth, sixth, and seventh grades. He proposes that this will allow the spot light to shine on the low achieving students. The progress of the low achieving students make on test scores factor into the rankings for the schools and teacher evaluations.
I agree that teacher evaluations should not be assessed by an average of high achieving students. A successful teacher is one who can help a student reach their full potential. The problem I see in this is how are they going to address the problems of the low achieving students if they are reducing test preparation in the classroom. Many students will be able to opt out of tests, so how will they balance the classroom curriculum? The most important part is missing in the article, and that is how will they deal with the different student populations and use their time wisely?
I agree with the conclusion of this article that merely changing the aesthetics of this program has not aided in the progress of our education system. Einstein stated that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. It's clear that 20 years of insanity has not helped our public education's ranking.
In terms of public education, Texans should be ashamed that we are 43rd in the nation for high school graduates. What are we doing wrong? According to State Representative Scot Hochberg our current system for preparing students to take state standardized tests such as the STARR is creating a crack in the system for low achieving students and they are falling through. His House Bill 233 would allow high achieving students to opt out of the state tests in the fourth, sixth, and seventh grades. He proposes that this will allow the spot light to shine on the low achieving students. The progress of the low achieving students make on test scores factor into the rankings for the schools and teacher evaluations.
I agree that teacher evaluations should not be assessed by an average of high achieving students. A successful teacher is one who can help a student reach their full potential. The problem I see in this is how are they going to address the problems of the low achieving students if they are reducing test preparation in the classroom. Many students will be able to opt out of tests, so how will they balance the classroom curriculum? The most important part is missing in the article, and that is how will they deal with the different student populations and use their time wisely?
I agree with the conclusion of this article that merely changing the aesthetics of this program has not aided in the progress of our education system. Einstein stated that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. It's clear that 20 years of insanity has not helped our public education's ranking.
Friday, July 20, 2012
Perry Let Down Texas Again
On July 10, 2012, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram published the article Resisting Medicaid expansion will double-burden Texas taxpayers
Governor Perry
has once again let down the Texans who need him the most. This well written
article highlights the lack of judgment Perry has shown, and the burden every
Texan has to bear. This was written for one of the largest metropolitan areas
in Texas , and is targeting the working poor. Perry’s
choice to pass up millions of dollars of federal funding is a double edged
sword. While standing up for Texas sovereignty sounds good for campaign rhetoric,
ignoring 6 million uninsured Texans is not.
The decision to
not create a state exchange reduces the option to have a plan made specifically
for Texas . The author notes that while that would
have been ideal, lawmakers put too much stock into the law being overturned. Opting
out of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act takes funds away from
Texans and provides support other states instead. Texas is in the number one spot for the highest
population without insurance, and we cannot afford to pass up on tens of
billions of dollars.
A further insult
to the working poor was inflicted in the form of the Medicaid program being
intentionally under funded by 6 billion dollars. This causes a symbiotic
relationship between a higher uninsured population and higher premiums for the
insured. If the Republicans are unable to overturn the health care law, the governor
needs to provide solutions and admit his mistake. I agree with the major points in the article. I find it frustrating that considering we are in crisis with our
citizens not having access to health care that our governor would dare turn
down funding without providing another solution.
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Texas Women's Health Program is Destroyed
On Wednesday, March 14, 2012, The Texas Independent published an article titled Rule excluding Planned Parenthood from Medicaid program takes effect today.
Today is a big blow for low income women of childbearing age. The Texas Women’s Health Program has been destroyed by Governor Rick Perry. In an attempt to attack Planned Parenthood because they perform abortions, Perry no longer allowed the clinic to be an option for the Women’s Health Program. This is in violation of federal law, and nowTexas
has lost 90 percent of its funding for women’s health. The most ridiculous
aspect of this attempt to prevent abortions is the fact that the federal and
state governments strictly prohibit the funds to be used for abortions!
I find this negligent move by the governor to be a slap in the face for all struggling low income people who want to be responsible but can’t afford it. The fact that $74 million dollars have already been taken away from family planning funding inTexas ,
makes me wonder if Perry has any concept of cause and effect! How is it that
they want to eradicate abortions, but they are leaving 290,000 women in Texas without
access to health care and birth control. The type of environment a child grows up in
can define the rest of their life. Is it right to allow an additional 20,000
unplanned pregnancies a year in this state because of someone’s poor judgment
and extremist beliefs?
I’m not for or against abortion because every person’s situation is different. If it is this state’s intention to eliminate abortion, they must make logical decisions and not turn their back on those who need them most. The great state of Texas should not be satisfied with more than half of its newest and most vulnerable citizens being unplanned.
Today is a big blow for low income women of childbearing age. The Texas Women’s Health Program has been destroyed by Governor Rick Perry. In an attempt to attack Planned Parenthood because they perform abortions, Perry no longer allowed the clinic to be an option for the Women’s Health Program. This is in violation of federal law, and now
I find this negligent move by the governor to be a slap in the face for all struggling low income people who want to be responsible but can’t afford it. The fact that $74 million dollars have already been taken away from family planning funding in
I’m not for or against abortion because every person’s situation is different. If it is this state’s intention to eliminate abortion, they must make logical decisions and not turn their back on those who need them most. The great state of Texas should not be satisfied with more than half of its newest and most vulnerable citizens being unplanned.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)